In honor of Sunday: here are two reasons why I’m not a Christian. First, I don’t believe. It’s not that I disbelieve, it’s that I don’t know. I have no faith in it. That’s the big reason. Second, I only know two people personally that I would consider to be living out Christian principles with […]
Goal of the day: think. Projects up next: “The Name of the Feather,” to be edited. “The Best of All Possible Beauregards,” still in first-draft stage. “Death by Chocolate,” in dire need of a rewrite. Plan: reread Feather. Try to imagine, if Lee can’t help me on this one, an imaginary audience for the story.
Goal accomplished. “Customer Service” now In the Mail, and under my own name. I’m not sure what I’m going to do about online submissions. I’ll see when I get there. I don’t really write all that much erotica. Erotica Readers (and Writers) Association is a good site — it’s where I found out about the
Goal of the day: format erotica story “Customer Service” for print. Learn lesson: if you choose to reformat out of standard manuscript format, save it to a different file! I’m debating whether to submit the story under my own name or a pseudonym.. I don’t think it’s such a big deal for print (and the
Article for work completed…what, ahead of schedule? Lee read “Feather” yesterday and didn’t like it. He said it was well-written, but… Now I have to wonder if it’s just that he didn’t like it, or that the story wasn’t likeable or accessible. I asked him for more comments, but I fell asleep. It’s been a
Goal finished, pun included. Wonderful, superlative, inhumanly (and I mean that literally) sexy, and magnificent spouse has not read it yet. Goal for the next 1-2 days: write article for work. Purchased Sword & Claw by Gene Wolfe yesterday as co-gift to self and spouse. Gene Wolfe…like Brian Aldiss, he’s one of those writers I
Something cool for anyone who reads, and who reads comics: Have you read Sandman? Do you remember Gilbert, a.k.a. Fiddler’s Green? Unfortumately, I’m having trouble finding a picture of him, so you’ll just have to visualise him. Check this out. Apparently G. K. Chesterton was a man who delighted in theological paradoxes, and “…was a